Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Disclaimer: Analyses contain personal opinions and meant to be informative but not authoritative or complete reviews of these efforts. Further - the current state of this page is DRAFT and additions/corrections/additional opinions are all very welcome. As the pilot proceeds, this information/opinions may help us decide where/how to maintain connections with RDA efforts.

For those looking for a shortcut - the groups are listed alphabetically and two of the most closely connected groups appear to be the PID Information Types and Research Data Repository Interoperability WGs.

Data Citation WG :

Product:

...

The collection modeling effort are potentially relevant to the pilot group task of standardizing the ability to traverse data publication structure. Based on a quick look, it wasn't clear how this WG connects with aggregation models such as ORE or the Portland Data Model (in the review list for the Research Data Repository Interoperability WG), but the API appears to go further in handling mutable collections and supporting intersection/union queries. 


Interest Groups:

There are a number of RDA Interest Groups that explore interoperability and sometimes serve as umbrella groups in areas such as metadata and persistent identifiers. In general, these groups don't create products at the level the working groups do, so they are not all included in the list here.

Long tail of research data IG:

Product:

This group is developing a set of good practices for institutional data management systems. They have created a matrix of  of desirable functionality for such systems.

...

Of interest to NDS, but not directly relevant to this pilot. Interesting that the ability to export full-fidelity metadata + data records is not one of the functionalities identified in the matrix.

Interest Groups:

There are a number of RDA Interest Groups that explore interoperability and sometimes serve as umbrella groups in areas such as metadata and persistent identifiers. In general, these groups don't create products at the level the working groups do, so they are not included in the list here.